Although most of us were not around during the era of silent movies, many of you may be familiar with a genre of movie referred to as a serial motion picture…. One of the more famous of this genre was titled, “The Perils of Pauline.” In this series, the heroine, Pauline, would be put into a perilous situation (i.e. tied to the railroad tracks with a fast approaching train, tied to a barrel filled with explosives, etc.) and during the course of the installment, Pauline would miraculously escape near certain death at the last possible moment. Each installment would end with words to the effect, “Tune in Next Week.”
Anyone familiar with “The Perils of Pauline” series cannot help but recognize the parallels between Pauline and healthcare providers as we watch our government deal with theSGR problem. Every few months, it seems, Congress waits until the last possible moment to fix the SGR cut and avoid the financial calamity that would ensue if Congress allowed the cut to take effect.
As we all know, in the latest “Perils of SGR,” Congress voted to delay any resolution of the SGR – and the potential 27% reduction in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule — in late 2011. However, that “fix” was only for two months and we were all told to, “Tune in next month,” as our intrepid Congress attempts to once again step in at the last minute to avoid yet another possible cut in physician fee schedule payments on March 1, 2012. Unfortunately, whereas “The Perils of Pauline” was a movie, the perils of the SGR cut are all too real.
On January 24th a House-Senate Conference Committee met for the first time to begin formal work on resolving the SGR differences between the House and Senate. Although this was the first meeting by the Representatives and Senators, their staffs had been meeting regularly leading up to this meeting. The Conference Committee met again on February 1st and 2nd, and additional meetings are anticipated over the next few weeks, during which committee members are to present all ideas and solutions.
Representative Renee Ellmers (R-NC), a freshman Member of Congress on the Conference Committee (and a healthcare executive prior to being elected to Congress in 2010) suggested a two-year extension for the SGR fix, thus giving the Congress time to find alternate solutions. Follow-up remarks made by several members of the Conference Committee indicated that there was at least some bi-partisan interest in coming up with a permanent fix to the SGR rather than another in the long series of temporary fixes.
The stumbling block for enacting a permanent SGR solution has not been the lack of an alternative formula, but rather how to pay for any fix the Congress might adopt. Current estimates are that adopting a permanent fix would increase the federal deficit by approximately $300 billion over the next year unless corresponding spending reductions were made to offset the debt.
The AMA and some other organizations have suggested that money saved by the ending of the war in Iraq could be used to pay for the SGRfix. The current federal budget (which projects spending out for 10 years) assumed that theIraq war would go on for several more years and money was budgeted for that purpose. However, with the ending of the war, the money previously budgeted will no longer be needed. Therefore, from a budgeting standpoint, this money could technically be redirected to pay for the SGR fix, rather than being set aside for the war inIraq. Doing so would not increase the projected federal deficit beyond current estimates as this would be viewed as a reprogramming of dollars already budgeted for another purpose. It remains to be seen whether the Congress will pursue this budgetary line of reasoning or not.
Although it appears unlikely that Congress would allow the 27% SGR-related cut to go into effect on March 1, there are no guarantees. Stay tuned for the next installment…
Adapted and reprinted with permission of Bill Finefrock, Washington Report – January 2012.